Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+question\s+about\s+2\.041XL\s+for\s+the\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+question\s+about\s+2\.041XL\s+for\s+the\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] question about 2.041XL for the Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Rick Borken" <rickb@cpinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 06:12:05 -0500; Now that the new firmware for the Orion II has been out for several months, I'd like to ask for your impressions about it compared to 2.039d. In particular, are there real benefits to the new option; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00338.html (6,915 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] question about 2.041XL for the Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:32:35 -0700; I haven't been using the AF AGC, mostly because the IF AGC works fine, but also because the AF system is still a 'work in progress'. This is a Beta release, and there needs to be work done to fix the; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00345.html (9,358 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]