Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+rambling\s+questions\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] rambling questions (score: 1)
Author: kk5ib@insolwwb.net (Darryl J. Kelly)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 08:53:48 -0700
I have been using MFJ 784 Digital Signal DSP Filters for about 3 years. I got one to use with my Yaesu FT-840 with 500 Hz CW filter. Work is mostly CW, and the 500 Hz was not not narrow enough in my
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-08/msg00013.html (9,294 bytes)

2. [TenTec] rambling questions (score: 1)
Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 06:07:42 -0800
Now there is an analogy that says it best! In two sentences, you covered the entire subject well! de KL7HF --Original Message-- From: Darryl J. Kelly <kk5ib@insolwwb.net> To: tentec@contesting.com <t
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-08/msg00016.html (9,742 bytes)

3. [TenTec] rambling questions (score: 1)
Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 08:47:31 -0700
Anyone here use the Timewave or the JPS DSP? I had a Timewave 59+ for a while, and I just got an NIR 10 with version 4 installed. Neat toys, but the audio artifacts and distortion drive me absolutely
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00311.html (8,227 bytes)

4. [TenTec] rambling questions (score: 1)
Author: dacalvin@us.ibm.com (Duane Calvin)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 12:40:37 -0400
Welcome to DSP. I have an NIR-12 and it is noticeably better than the NIR-10. The 12 has dual DSP modes, and I tend NOT to use the NIR mode due to time delay (doesn't work well with QSK CW - hi!). In
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00312.html (10,054 bytes)

5. [TenTec] rambling questions (score: 1)
Author: troy_wideman@eee.org (Troy Wideman)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 09:50:30 -0700
Clark, I had the NIR 10 w/V4 and tried to use it with my Omni VI +#3 and finally gave up. The audio was so distracting with the constant "gurgling" that I sold the NIR 10-- the ham that bought it ( I
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00313.html (9,278 bytes)

6. [TenTec] rambling questions (score: 1)
Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre)
Date: 29 Jul 1998 13:27:22 -0500
Clark and the group, I have and use the basic Timewave box. Eventually need to upgrade it, but for SSB with the Scout, it does remove all 40M phone band Broadcast heterodynes, and I notice no added s
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00314.html (8,236 bytes)

7. [TenTec] rambling questions (score: 1)
Author: vlegare@gnv.fdt.net (Vin Legare)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 17:18:40 -0400
Clark, Interesting comments about the processors. I haven't personally used them but have heard similar on the air comments from others ... particualrly about the fact that the noise reduction occasi
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00316.html (7,647 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu