Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+rx366\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+rx366\s*$/: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 00:44:03 +0000; That's the way I use the sub-receiver as well. I have a local friend who bought the OII with the 366 installed and, after having listened to it a number of times, I can't see a reason to purchase it.; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00178.html (8,933 bytes)
62. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 21:13:47 -0400; While I do not have the rx366, I do have the Eagle. The only problem with the Eagle for SWL broadcast stations is the filtering is too narrow. You can't get good AM fidelity with 6 khz as the widest; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00179.html (10,328 bytes)
63. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: José Félix Ballester <jfballester@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 21:26:34 -0400; Try the 15 kHz filter for FM, it works on AM. Pepe, WP3HW 73 de Guaynabo, Isla de Puerto Rico While I do not have the rx366, I do have the Eagle. The only problem with the Eagle for SWL broadcast sta; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00180.html (10,838 bytes)
64. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 21:29:09 -0400; That works for me, Ray. Thanks. -- K8JHR -- Since I started this thread a few days ago, let me try to summarize where we are. _______________________________________________________ .. ______________; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00181.html (8,160 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: "R. Eric Sluder" <resluder@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 22:32:38 -0400; That makes the 15KHz filter a sweet option. I bought mine slightly used and it came with the 6 & 15 KHz filters. I was going to swap the 15 for a 600 Hz filter but I don't feel like I need the 600 Hz; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00183.html (11,670 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 22:43:45 -0400; I don't have the 15 khz filter but I'm sure that would solve it. Is that an option for the RX366? Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, NC 28635 www.n4py.com On 5/20/2013 10:32 PM, R. Eric Slu; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00184.html (11,795 bytes)
67. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 22:44:34 -0400; "The average ham, such as myself, will rarely, if ever, find himself surrounded by 30+ dB over S9 signals even during contests." I apologize for colossal ignorance and misunderstanding of what is mea; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00185.html (10,229 bytes)
68. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 20:13:53 -0400 (EDT); Right on, Duane. If the sub rx doesn't copy the DX well, then I flip around and do it your way. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 5/20/2013 11:41:16 P.M. GMT Standard Time, ac5aa1@gmail.com writes: Soun; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00188.html (12,643 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:23:20 -0500; This is prettying how I use it, too. The main rx has the arsenal needed to handle hearing the DX. I only have problems when the pile is filled with nearby, strong signals and the DX is working someon; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00192.html (15,662 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:41:53 -0400; One thing to remember on the original Orion sub-receiver is if you turn on the attenuator for the sub, you can eliminate most overloading. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, NC 28635 www.n4; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00193.html (14,398 bytes)
71. [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 16:24:35 -0400; One more bit of information on the design that may clear up some points. I relayed this to a couple of other hams earlier in email conversations and thought you all here would benefit from the knowle; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00194.html (10,585 bytes)
72. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 20:24:33 -0400 (EDT); _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00196.html (8,205 bytes)
73. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:39:26 -0400 (EDT); Judging from some of the comments, I must be fortunate to live in an area with no strong local signals. The only times when either receiver in my Orion II folds are when the hardware noise blanker is; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00197.html (9,703 bytes)
74. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 15:52:14 +0200; When I win the lottery Ray, I'll buy you one too. I have no idea if this would even happen in the states. You don't have the problem with shortwave broadcast stations that we have here in Europe. Sur; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00198.html (11,037 bytes)
75. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 14:55:03 -0400; I have no idea if this would even happen in the states. _________________________________________________ Yes, but from a slightly different source. Some HF receivers in some locations have problems; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00199.html (13,278 bytes)
76. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 21:45:17 +0200; James, you are completely correct. We have never had the problem with AM BC stations here in Europe like you guys have in the states. My hunch is, it doesn't make a lot of sense to have a 50KW AM BC; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00200.html (16,067 bytes)
77. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:19:57 +0300; On 05/22/2013 10:45 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote: James, you are completely correct. We have never had the problem with AM BC stations here in Europe like you guys have in the states. My hunch is,; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00202.html (9,013 bytes)
78. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 09:06:10 +0200; Geoff, Would be interesting to know its call sign and how much power it was running, AND, if it is still on the air. The AM BC band is dying over here. Perhaps 10kw or 20kw would be enough to hear it; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00203.html (10,220 bytes)
79. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:22:57 +0300; Would be interesting to know its call sign and how much power it was running, AND, if it is still on the air. The AM BC band is dying over here. Perhaps 10kw or 20kw would be enough to hear it at tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00204.html (9,323 bytes)
80. Re: [TenTec] RX366 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:49:16 -0400 (EDT); Hi Rick, Actually, I've done a fair amount of HF operating from G3LDI's place in Norfolk. Roger then had a TH6DXX (since replaced with a SteppIR) at 110 feet. Most of that was on 20, though, which as; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-05/msg00206.html (12,031 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]