Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+swr\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+swr\s*$/: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1): Author: John - K4WJ <k4wjfoc1749@wildblue.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:36:41 -0400; Just because you and I are interested in the subject doesn't mean it is an appropriate subject for the TenTec reflector. There are people on this reflector that are not interested in this subject. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00268.html (12,523 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1): Author: James Duffer <dufferjames@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:06:20 -0500; furthermore, we must remember that Ten Tec sells antenna tuners, both stand alone and those installed in radios, this alone would justify threads like this. Jim (wd4air) _____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00271.html (10,853 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:11:29 -0500; And the thread started with a user of Tentec rig and amplifier having a tuner change tune on its own while feeding a 43' vertical tuned only by the tuner (not tentec). Where two fundamentals came to; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00272.html (9,657 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1): Author: "Walt Amos" <waltk8cv4612amos@att.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:55:17 -0400; Your persistence has paid off ........................ swr is now in my filters :-) Walt K8CV Royal Oak, MI. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00274.html (10,469 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 44
Page: [1] [2] [3]