Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+which\s+balun\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+which\s+balun\?\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 15:03:03 -0400; In your case, where you have the coax to the antenna buried underground, it actually already has an effective choke on it. The problem when discussing the 43 ft. vertical is, ...There isn't going to; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00415.html (11,795 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 15:10:10 -0400; Good news, bad news on your suggestion to use two separate baluns for the job. The good news is, your suggestion to use two baluns is a great idea. The bad news is, even though you probably concluded; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00416.html (9,239 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 17:04:08 -0400; Golly, no. I thought Rick mentioned that, and posted a ink to a photo of one he uses. On the other hand, I am under the impression a well made balun on a sufficiently large and appropriate formula fe; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00418.html (10,400 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 21:37:21 -0500; *Helped my friend.... Dale/KA4ZDR with mine. He does quite well with the Multiband Dipole and the Ugly Balun. I Need to build another one. They work GREAT. I was just concerned with the Loss of the C; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00422.html (12,862 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:51:41 -0500 (CDT); Based on 25 ft of RG-213 at 30 MHz the loss will be about 0.3 dB. Lower frequencies will be less. 73 Bob, K4TAX -- Disclosure: I am a Tentec Ambassador and compensated according to the Tentec Ambassa; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00425.html (14,521 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:51:43 -0500 (CDT); Based on 25 ft of RG-213 at 30 MHz the loss will be about 0.3 dB. Lower frequencies will be less. 73 Bob, K4TAX -- Disclosure: I am a Tentec Ambassador and compensated according to the Tentec Ambassa; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00426.html (14,212 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:16:11 -0500; *Bob,* * Hello and Thanks for the help. I am dumping the output from the Balun or Ugly Balun ( depends on which is used ) into 450 ohm Window/Ladder Line and a Dipole which is 126 feet long at about; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00428.html (16,434 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:38:26 +0200; Who did they name that Balun after, Bob? (hi) I used the Ugly Balun from 2007 until 2010 at my QTH in Oklahoma. PERFECT EXAMPLE of where a 4:1 balun is crap; I was running 700w into shortened vertica; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00429.html (12,678 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:04:22 +0200; James, There is no need to separate the two toroids more than they are separated inside that balun. That is the one nice part about using toroids. Separation need only be about 2x or 3x the diameter; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00430.html (11,284 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:45:10 -0400; Very interesting, I would have thought there would be some capacitance or inductance or something between the 2 coils being so close together. Please remind me what you did to weather seal the toroid; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00458.html (8,683 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:12:54 +0200; James, When I'm weather sealing baluns, it depends on what the purpose of the balun is. For use on sturdy masts, I do it like everybody else does, and place everything in well sealed plastic enclosur; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00466.html (10,535 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 06:17:44 -0700; Lightweight and stealthy has been my life too. What fiberglass masts? I have a few of the DK9SQ masts with extensions which I like a lot. I weave them up through trees so they stick out the top to su; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00469.html (12,307 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] which balun? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:52:30 -0400; ER... um ... I think I can tell you. ;-) Spiderbeam masts! Which are just about the best available for this sort of thing. Not only are they pretty tough, but they come in ridiculously LONG models -; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00475.html (9,139 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 33
Page: [1] [2]