Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+wide\s+SSB\s+issue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+wide\s+SSB\s+issue\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] wide SSB issue (score: 1): Author: k5uj@hotmail.com (Rob Atkinson, K5UJ); Date: Fri Apr 18 09:27:58 2003; I was very surprised that the FCC would take anything approximating an official action on this issue. I believe it is a personality driven conflict without factual basis. Riley Hollingsworth has had; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00454.html (8,355 bytes)
2. [TenTec] wide SSB issue (score: 1): Author: ku3g@yahoo.com (JOHN); Date: Fri Apr 18 10:40:40 2003; hi rob, yes i personally no one of the gentleman on 178 and what you say is correct, however if your receiver only has a bandpass of 2.8 , i believe you won't hear there full capablity, i'm with you; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00455.html (9,117 bytes)
3. [TenTec] wide SSB issue (score: 1): Author: tjednacz@ieee.org (Thomas Jednacz); Date: Fri Apr 18 11:02:27 2003; Rob - they have cleaned up their act. Most of them are now doing a good job. Last year there were a bunch who did not know what they were doing and had 15 and 20 KHz wide signals. They so over drove; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00456.html (9,451 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]