Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[To\:\s+WILLIAM_B_LUMNITZER\:\s+Re\:\s+ag6k\s+$n6cq\s+comments$\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[To\:\s+WILLIAM_B_LUMNITZER\:\s+Re\:\s+ag6k\s+$n6cq\s+comments$\]\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [To: WILLIAM_B_LUMNITZER: Re: ag6k (n6cq comments)] (score: 1): Author: Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Waltk@PICA.ARMY.MIL); Date: Thu Apr 13 17:03:46 1995; Fantastic news! I am so happy that Rich is getting "his day in court." The League should be ashamed of itself for not publishing his rebuttal. I guess the League is above us all and doesn't have to a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-04/msg00067.html (7,660 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]