- 1. [TowerTalk] "Tower in the woods" (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Bragassa" <bragassa@consolidated.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:49:15 -0500
- When I moved from Wyoming to South Texas I was paranoid about hurricanes and tornado's. I even put an additional set guys on my first tower. (Lottsa' good they will do; I know now!) It's the falling
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00309.html (9,013 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] "Tower in the woods" (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott W3TX" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:08:58 -0400
- Hi Doug, One solution is to consider a 60ft self supporting rotatable pole. It has no guy wires, rotates from the base, plus you have the entire mast under 60ft to have other antennas in a stack. I t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00315.html (7,386 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] "Tower in the woods" (score: 1)
- Author: k2qmf@juno.com
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:09:49 -0400
- Hello All, I have a question about a tower in the woods... If a tower, in the woods, falls over and no one is around would it make any noise??? Thanks for any info. 73, Ted K2QMF ____________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00329.html (8,677 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] "tower in the woods" (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Hansel <mustbhe@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
- Thanks to all who have replied. It's given me a lot of food for thought. I have two different locations that i'm going to pick between based on easy clearance of a suitable area. As to all the folks
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00331.html (8,297 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] "tower in the woods" (score: 1)
- Author: "mryan001" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:31:58 -0400
- I'm with you Doug. I would simply clear some space for guy wire LANES and put up the towers. I posted a response about OCF dipoles and how I strung one between towers in my own woods in Virginia. The
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00332.html (10,408 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] "tower in the woods" (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Kelley N1BUG <paul.kelley.n1bug@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:55:52 -0400
- Doug, Good luck with whatever you decide to do. While I totally agree the best approach is to cut down all trees or big branches that could fall on a guy wire, it ain't a happening thing here! Ditto
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00333.html (9,133 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] "Tower in the woods" (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:35:56 -0500
- If you were climbing at the time no one would hear your screams. <grin> 73, Keith NM5G --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00338.html (9,743 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] "Tower in the woods" (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:55:34 -0700
- -- Or--if a man speaks in the forest and there is not a woman to hear him, is he still wrong??? 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ __________________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00348.html (8,099 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] "Tower in the woods" (score: 1)
- Author: k2qmf@juno.com
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:51:24 -0400
- YES, without a doubt... Ted K2QMF On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:55:34 -0700 "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> writes: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00361.html (8,744 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu