Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\"Up\s+The\s+Tower\"\s+in\s+December\s+1997\s+CQ\s+Magazine\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\"Up\s+The\s+Tower\"\s+in\s+December\s+1997\s+CQ\s+Magazine\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] "Up The Tower" in December 1997 CQ Magazine (score: 1): Author: dave@egh.com (David Clemons); Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 18:16:37 -0500 (EST); Anyone who owns a crankup tower should read this article, especially the two personal experiences concerning safety issues when working on these things (in short, DON'T CLIMB!). When I was old enough; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00078.html (8,228 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] "Up The Tower" in December 1997 CQ Magazine (score: 1): Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole); Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 23:19:56 -0500 (EST); I found the noted article slightly biased against crank-up towers. Do not climb, is clear and obvious, altho many apparently do that! However, initial cost of tower is not the only cost in the case o; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00083.html (7,841 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]