- 1. [TowerTalk] $$$ and contesting stations (score: 1)
- Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:23:03 -0400 (EDT)
- It's not always a matter of $$, although that does help. I've seen presentations of $100,000 installations that were foolishly designed. I've seen great stations designed on a shoestring out in the b
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00169.html (7,872 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] $$$ and contesting stations (score: 1)
- Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:23:08 -0400
- deals. K4XS/KH7XS Cheap ham...aren't most of us? I'd say you described "frugal" or economically wise. There is a huge difference between careful acquisition and "cheap". Kinda, sorta, similar to the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00170.html (7,524 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] $$$ and contesting stations (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 18:04:01 -0400
- And, you need to have the time, schedule/patience, storage space. If you have to pay for any of those, the surplus deals may not be as cost effective. It's like any bargain hunting... Some like the h
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00176.html (8,557 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] $$$ and contesting stations (score: 1)
- Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 19:27:37 -0400
- This is big challenge with managing hams (including myself) when they are in a business setting. They're used to scrounging for the deal, which might actually cost more when all those other costs are
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00177.html (9,070 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu