Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+$Long$MFJ259B\s+\&\s+PL\-259\/SO\-239\s+Pair\s+Losses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+$Long$MFJ259B\s+\&\s+PL\-259\/SO\-239\s+Pair\s+Losses\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] (Long)MFJ259B & PL-259/SO-239 Pair Losses (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 15:45:02 -0900; Hi all, It has been suggested here on TT, that a loss budget of about 0.1 dB per PL-239 in your antenna/transmission line system was a good idea. Well, that got me to thinking: I have a BUNCH of PL-2; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00975.html (13,000 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] (Long)MFJ259B & PL-259/SO-239 Pair Losses (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 20:57:21 -0400; This is scary ... and very helpful as I plan my system ... now to include avoiding baluns, tuners, switches, and the like as much as possible! Thanks for sharing! (And as the stereotypical shrink wo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00976.html (7,987 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] (Long)MFJ259B & PL-259/SO-239 Pair Losses (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 22:06:50 -0400 (EDT); For minimal loss in systems that can effectively replace coax with parallel transmission line (and not all can), I would suggest open-wire 600-ohm line rather than any of the more convenient but sli; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00977.html (8,946 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] (Long)MFJ259B & PL-259/SO-239 Pair Losses (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com); Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 09:37:42 EDT; Hmmm, one might read Moxon's treatise on HF Antennas For All Locations... In one chapter he describes measuring the losses of 150 yards of bits and pieces of open wire line fed and terminated by a pa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00992.html (8,029 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]