Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\(no\s+subject\)\s+Vertical\s+Antenna\s+Instead\s+of\s+Tower\s+Decision\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:15:06 -0400
Good Day Tower Talkians -- I am trying to select an antenna to install before the winter arrives. I live in Michigan, and have a smallish, 100' (N-S) x 55' (E-W) suburban backyard that has a bit of a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00264.html (14,797 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:44:32 -0400
I've used a number of verticals and each type has it's pluses and minuses. I do not like the tall verticals that are loaded on all bands as the RF for the higher bands is radiated at too steep an ang
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00265.html (10,355 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
James, I'd suggest you evaluate a few more alternatives before deciding: 1. Retain your existing antennas until you install something more permanent. Compared to your existing antennas, you'll be dis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00266.html (18,470 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Tim N9PUZ <tim.n9puz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:39:09 -0500
I had much the same question. From the diagram you already know where you want the tower. What type are you considering? Is there a big lead time on delivery? If you choose something like Rohn 25 or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00271.html (9,106 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:49:55 -0700
It would be nice if they would give you that statement in writing (not about the fighting, but that no permits are needed). Wife would like to avoid large I would think that you can do the radials in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00272.html (12,828 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <n7xy@clearwire.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:28:18 -0700
When I moved to my present location 8+ years ago, I asked myself many of the same questions. I figured I was at the point where age and health meant that tower climbing wasn't really an option and, u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00274.html (10,443 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:10:20 -0700
I agree with Frank that no vertical is going to be that great on the higher bands, but a vertical with a lot of radials COULD make you happy on 80 and 160 if those bands are important to you. We've t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00276.html (9,526 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:59:14 -0400
Hi Jim -- 1) City did provide a statement in writing - with copies of ordinance and statement of interpretation by inspector's office. 2) I like to work barefoot, but have a plenty big TenTec Centuri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00461.html (10,441 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:03:54 -0400
Hi Frank -- Thanks for the strong reply to my questions. Based on your comments, I would be better off making higher, longer, and better wire antennas and working towards a beam on a tower, instead o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00470.html (11,162 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:14:16 -0400
The SteppIR DreamBeam will get you on 40 thru 6M. http://www.steppir.com/files/DB%2036%20brochure.pdf 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ ___________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00483.html (9,289 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:10:45 -0700
elevated vertical dipole, as opposed to a ground mounted vertical monopole. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00486.html (10,128 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu