Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\(no\s+subject\)\s+Vertical\s+Antenna\s+Instead\s+ofTower\s+Decision\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead ofTower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: turnbull <turnbull@net1.ie>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:11:04 +0100
You might consider a SteppIR vertical the larger model covers 40 through 6 and is tuned to each band as you shift frequency. A loading coil is available for 80 meters and this tune is also tuned by t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00268.html (8,194 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead ofTower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: "Don Hall" <donhall161@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:00:05 -0500
Use your tower with gamma or omega matches on 80/160. Works best with a self-supporting one, but lots of operators use insulated guys. I made my 160 DXCC with an LM354 loaded that way on an 80x120 lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00485.html (12,898 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead ofTower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Dennis <radioart@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:23:30 -0800
A new technique for feeding towers has been adopted for Amateur use from the broadcast industry. You drop 3 heavy gauge wires connected at the top of the tower to within a few feet of the bottom. Con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00488.html (14,828 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead ofTower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:33:51 -0400
Sounds to me just like a fat shunt feed, at least in principle. 73, Pete N4ZR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00489.html (16,045 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead ofTower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:12:54 +0000
Sounds like the Monopole design. I had one up for 40 years ago. 73, Dick, W1KSZ tower with gamma or omega matches on 80/160. Works best with a > > self-supporting one, but lots of operators use insul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00492.html (15,026 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead ofTower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Dennis <radioart@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:18:05 -0700
Yes, Works very well for feeding towers, the best I know of. I'm putting up a 70'er with stacked beams and plan to use this shunt feed system for 80m and 160m.... Dennis, k0eoo r or ta ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00493.html (16,521 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu