Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Amps\]\s+Bill\s+Orr\s+comment\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Amps] Bill Orr comment (score: 1)
Author: chasm@texas.net
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:59:07 -0500
I am sorry but I do not understand your numbers using my Construction Master IV I multiply 1500 by 70% = 1050 after all, 50% would be 750. please explain to this old phart what I am missing here. 73
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00612.html (7,044 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Amps] Bill Orr comment (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:15:17 +0200
1500 output at 70% efficiency requires 1500/0.7! 2143W input, The difference is the dissipation of 643W. 1500W/643W=2.33 73 Peter 1500/643=2.33. I am sorry but I do not understand your numbers using
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00614.html (8,169 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Amps] Bill Orr comment (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:17:33 -0700
Percentage the wrong way.. DC power in = RF power out/efficiency Power dissipated = DC Power In - RF power out 1500/0.7 =2143 2143-1500 = 643W _______________________________________________ ________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00624.html (8,084 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] [Amps] Bill Orr comment (score: 1)
Author: chasm@texas.net
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:49:53 -0500
My apologies everyone, I have NO idea how I got an AMPS thread into this elist. must be something I did with TBird. I sure do wish that Forte would port Agent to the Mac OS-X sigh thanks 73 de chas k
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00625.html (7,970 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu