Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+Re\:\s+\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+Re\:\s+Tower\s+Restrictions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+Re\:\s+\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+Re\:\s+Tower\s+Restrictions\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [BULK] - Re: [BULK] - Re: Tower Restrictions (score: 1): Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:59:45 -0800; at there's the the Actually the house in question had CC&Rs but no HOA. I once looked at a house on acreage where the CC&Rs prohibited antennas, but specifically said "no restrictions on any livesto; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00924.html (9,557 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [BULK] - Re: [BULK] - Re: Tower Restrictions (score: 1): Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:02:11 -0800; Hi Steve, The house I had with the restriction on liquor sales was in L.A. (West Hills). I figured the guy who sold the land to the developer must have been a teetotaler. L.A. was pretty antenna frie; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00933.html (11,190 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]