Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+FW\:\s+Coax\s+lengths\s+for\s+phasing\s+a\s+stack\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+FW\:\s+Coax\s+lengths\s+for\s+phasing\s+a\s+stack\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] FW: Coax lengths for phasing a stack (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 22:14:42 -0800; Thanks to all for the comments. I did model pattern change for feedpoint phase differences and found that at even with one feed offset +/- 45 degrees the lobe angle is unchanged at 9 deg for my 20m s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00150.html (13,289 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] FW: Coax lengths for phasing a stack (score: 1): Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 03:46:16 -0500; Or: "Take care of the millibels and the decibels will take care of themselves." 73 from Ian GM3SEK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00151.html (8,499 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] FW: Coax lengths for phasing a stack (score: 1): Author: Markku Oksanen <ww1c@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:59:33 +0000; It may not really make too much cable since even on 20 m 1/4 wave in RG-213 type cable is 3.5 meters and you have thus 3.5, 10.5, 17.5 and 24.5 meters to use. And if desired, one can have a feed to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00152.html (10,659 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]