Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+Radials\s+how\s+deep\s+is\s+too\s+deep\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+Radials\s+how\s+deep\s+is\s+too\s+deep\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Radials how deep is too deep? (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:43:48 -0800; from the original post "I guess that my saving grace is that all of the radials are individual runs and could be added or subtracted from the field for testing. The goal for the radials would be to u; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-12/msg00162.html (10,747 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Radials how deep is too deep? (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:53:08 -0800; An important difference between AM BC stations and typical ham stations is budget and FCC Rules, both of which drive the radial system. Yes, 120 radials and a ground screen have been the gold standar; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-12/msg00164.html (11,630 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]