Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+LMR600\s+up\s+to\s+the\s+top\s+of\s+tower\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+LMR600\s+up\s+to\s+the\s+top\s+of\s+tower\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: LMR600 up to the top of tower ? (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 06:56:13 -0700; An interesting idea. What steel rope are you using? Since the hardline easily has the strength to self support off a Kellem 90' of itself, does the wire rope somehow cause the hardline to coil? How f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00003.html (9,960 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: LMR600 up to the top of tower ? (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 07:16:23 -0700; I second Roger's comment. Coax I removed from a large stack were 7/8 hardline to LMR600UF swing arm loops, and the 600 was in bad shape after 7 years. Several cuts, one complete tear of the braid, wa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00004.html (10,869 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: LMR600 up to the top of tower ? (score: 1): Author: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 10:43:41 -0700; Grant, I will have a stack on my HDX589 consisting of 40/20 on the bottom and a new 17/15/12/10 on top. I see your point on LMR600UF for the swing arm loops not holding up. So lets see if I have your; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00005.html (12,452 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]