Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+MASTS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Bulk\]\s+Re\:\s+MASTS\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: MASTS (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:35 -0700; Gerald, Could you point me to the 35kpsi spec? I couldn't find a steel spec on the Wheatland EMT manufacturer site, or that matter on any other site I looked at that google turned up re conduit specs; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00268.html (11,873 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: MASTS (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:03:45 -0500; What is possible in the worst case and what is likely seem two different things. I've not seen EMT do anything other than just bend (which it does pretty easily) and buckle (if you really really abus; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00269.html (13,330 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: MASTS (score: 1): Author: TexasRF--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:39:49 -0400; Hi Grant, when I did a google search for "EMT yield strength" a reference came up with the 35000 psi yield number. I didn't notice that the actual product was called IMC which is not the same thing a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00270.html (11,566 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: MASTS (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:59:59 -0700; Jeff, Your scenario is a likely one, although cyclic loading above a certain threshold of yield stress greatly accelerates fatigue failures in steel. It's worse in aluminum, and I saw that happen on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00271.html (14,263 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: MASTS (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:21:33 -0400; Alternative materials for masts , or any material leave you playing the odds. The stronger the materials the more the odds are in your favor. An antenna of only 5 sq ft of wind area on a 145' mast be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00283.html (14,788 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: MASTS (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:19:31 -0400; 15' mast...15 ft! I don't know how that 4 snuck in. Musta fat fingered the keys. Roger (K8RI) On 3/16/2016 Wednesday 2:21 PM, Roger (K8RI) on TT wrote: Alternative materials for masts , or any materi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00286.html (15,509 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]