Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[NitPickTalk\]\s+Inverted\s+L\s+for\s+160\s+meters\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:23:46 +0000
N4UM had explained here to "Tom" that instead of using a longer radiator for a 160m inverted-L (then tuning out the inductive reactance with a series cap) he increases the length of the radials inste
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00486.html (8,753 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:12:45 -0700
Hi, Brett. I think you are correct on all counts, even though I still think radials close to the ground (in terms of a wavelength) tend to as if they were actually on the ground. That sounds contradi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00498.html (13,120 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Cotton, N4UM" <N4UM@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:50:52 -0400
Brett: I mentioned nothing about radials in my post to Tom. I guess you assumed I was talking about radials instead of radiators. perhaps I should have made that more clear. In fact, I use NO radials
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00524.html (8,408 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:38:11 +0000
AB7E added to my desire to understand how it is possible for the length of radials on the ground to establish resonance of a vertical: Oh, there is no question that proximity to ground has an effect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00526.html (13,871 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu