- 1. Re: [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:23:46 +0000
- N4UM had explained here to "Tom" that instead of using a longer radiator for a 160m inverted-L (then tuning out the inductive reactance with a series cap) he increases the length of the radials inste
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00486.html (8,753 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:12:45 -0700
- Hi, Brett. I think you are correct on all counts, even though I still think radials close to the ground (in terms of a wavelength) tend to as if they were actually on the ground. That sounds contradi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00498.html (13,120 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 Meters (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Cotton, N4UM" <N4UM@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:50:52 -0400
- Brett: I mentioned nothing about radials in my post to Tom. I guess you assumed I was talking about radials instead of radiators. perhaps I should have made that more clear. In fact, I use NO radials
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00524.html (8,408 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] [NitPickTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:38:11 +0000
- AB7E added to my desire to understand how it is possible for the length of radials on the ground to establish resonance of a vertical: Oh, there is no question that proximity to ground has an effect
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00526.html (13,871 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu