Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\{SPAM\}\s+Re\:\s+hazer\s+comments\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] {SPAM} Re: hazer comments (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Hearn" <dhearn@air-pipe.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:05:08 -0700
Dennis: You will find different opinions here on many subjects however I believe there is almost uniform opinion on guying crankup towers. Don't do it. That puts additional stress on the lifting cabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00834.html (11,172 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] {SPAM} Re: hazer comments (score: 1)
Author: "WA3GIN" <wa3gin@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:43:31 -0400
Don't do it unless the tower is designed for guying...some are! The TRI-EX CT-100 is a crank-up designed to be guyed. Each tower section carries the weight of those above it. Not a problem for the 1/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00835.html (8,463 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] {SPAM} Re: hazer comments (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:17:31 -0400
(If I did the math correctly) Think of it this way. Each 1/4" guy wire at 440# tension (10% of 4400# strength) and 60 degrees at the anchor = 30 degrees angle at the tower. Neglecting the weight of t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00837.html (8,709 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] {SPAM} Re: hazer comments (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:07:02 EDT
Your math looks ok; but this is without any wind blowing on the structure! What will the forces be with 70mph winds? 73/k5gw In a message dated 7/30/2008 11:18:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time, K8RI-on-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00839.html (8,938 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] {SPAM} Re: hazer comments (score: 1)
Author: "bill rubin" <brubin2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:21:20 -0500
sorry not 10% (#440) !! example 1/4 at 60F is #670 tension Guy Guy Cable Initial Tension (lb) Cable Ambient Temperature Diameter 0°F 20° F 40° F 60° F 80° F 100° F 120° F 3/16 590 520 460 400 340 280
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00843.html (10,574 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] {SPAM} Re: hazer comments (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:10:41 -0400
It is on mine. <:-)) 1/4" Phyllistran is 4400# test, 5/16 is 6600# or was when I installed mine. It's changed a little since then. I think I mentioned in the original post that going to steel would i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00845.html (9,088 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] {SPAM} Re: hazer comments (score: 1)
Author: "bill rubin" <brubin2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:34:51 -0500
Rodger, When you said "So going to EHS over Phyllistran would more than double the pull on the tower raising cables." Thats not really apples to apples. Yes I agree 5/16 EHS #6650 has higher tensel s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00855.html (10,675 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] {SPAM} Re: hazer comments (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:53:16 -0400
Agreed. My main concern it that hams realize how much extra load they are putting on a crank up tower by guying it. Some of those towers are engineered to take guys with their additional load and som
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00856.html (9,119 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu