Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\.\s+Re\:\s+2006\s+Top\s+Ten\s+Chutzpah\s+Awards\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: Bill Ogden <ogden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:20:33 -0400
The BW price seems a little high, considering they are advertising in a ham magazine. However, please think a little before claiming it is an almost useless antenna. I believe it consumes up to half
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00737.html (8,399 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: HFDXJUNKIE@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:43:52 EDT
Who cares, and why has this stupid post still going on anyway? Must be nice to be able to waste time posting such useless stupid crap. Pete NA2P _______________________________________________ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00738.html (6,609 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: "Bill" <w7vp@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:35:26 -0700
Frankly Pete I have found these comments neither "useless" not "crap." Yours, on the other hand . . . 73 Bill W7VP -- Original Message -- From: <HFDXJUNKIE@aol.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00739.html (8,302 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: HFDXJUNKIE@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:51:33 EDT
I don't see how the ARRL and QST publishes has anything to do with towers and installations..like I said totally useless and crap. Complain to the ARRL or President Bush if you don't like what people
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00741.html (7,111 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:11:29 -0500
one. That's a pretty broad statement to make. If so, how come all the big guns use very big antennas? 73, Keith NM5G The BW price seems a little high, considering they are advertising in a ham magaz
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00742.html (9,478 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:07:47 -0700
Tradition, mostly, which drives availability in the ham market. Convenience and cost effectiveness for a particular system application also drives it. Small granularity for adding to the system (you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00746.html (9,316 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:37:48 -0400
< snip > It depends on what you mean by smaller but in the normal sense, I doubt it would work out that way. The design programs will show a "full size" yagi should perform the best compared to well
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00749.html (12,383 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:27:13 -0700
How true! I had a 3 element TH-3 up for a while. I never did care for how it worked so I took it down and made a 2 element 20 meter monobander (smaller antenna) out of it, which worked much better t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00757.html (8,442 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:38:26 -0700
This is true for yagis, but not for antennas in general. In general, for instance, an all driven phased array can outperform a yagi (in which N-1 element are passively excited) of the same size. This
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00767.html (11,207 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] . Re: 2006 Top Ten Chutzpah Awards (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:20:07 -0500
I think most have missed the point of the original poster on "antenna size". I believe what he was referring to when he said "a small antenna radiates just as well as a large antenna" was in referenc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00792.html (10,225 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu