Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+1\.8\s+MHz\s+half\s+sloper\s+using\s+tower\s+VSWR\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+1\.8\s+MHz\s+half\s+sloper\s+using\s+tower\s+VSWR\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 1.8 MHz half sloper using tower VSWR question (score: 1): Author: yv5lix@yv5lix.org.ve (Jose M. Valdes R.); Date: Tue Feb 18 12:06:09 2003; Hi all. I'm new to this list but I have being reading your posts at the archives in contesting.com and I must say that I enjoy them very much. Now, I have a question. After 9 years I'm getting back o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-02/msg00344.html (9,609 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 1.8 MHz half sloper using tower VSWR question (score: 1): Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR); Date: Tue Feb 18 12:41:10 2003; Jose': My 80M half-sloper also exhibits a very wide 2:1 SWR bandwidth. If I recall, it's below 2:1 from 3.5 - 3.8 MHz. It's resonant (min SWR) around 3.6 MHz. The sloper wire is about 67 feet long, a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-02/msg00345.html (11,938 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 1.8 MHz half sloper using tower VSWR question (score: 1): Author: w7ts@attbi.com (Ken Kinyon - W7TS); Date: Tue Feb 18 17:39:36 2003; I think there may be some math errors in computing your SWR. Unless I am mistaken, The lowest possible SWR is 1:1, so if you are getting 0.2 to one something is wrong with the formula you are using.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-02/msg00346.html (10,835 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 1.8 MHz half sloper using tower VSWR question (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Tue Feb 18 18:56:55 2003; You mean I should stop laying the ground pipe system?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-02/msg00347.html (8,228 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]