Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+1\s+control\s+box\s+on\s+more\s+than\s+1\s+rotor\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 1 control box on more than 1 rotor (score: 1)
Author: WB4UNA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:02:03 EST
I am going to stick a couple more towers in the air and wondering if anyone has tried or done the below . i would like to operate 2 or more rotors with one control box. They will al be TX2 style roto
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00267.html (7,148 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] 1 control box on more than 1 rotor (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:16:06 -0800
I'm not sure that I see the advantage to this, unless both towers are near each other and very far from the shack. If you connect the motors together so that both turn at the same time, you will need
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00269.html (7,415 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 1 control box on more than 1 rotor (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:48:47 -0500
Or a small box with ONE multi-pole switch that could easily switch from one rotor to another. I mulled over this possibility for years, but rotor control boxes are relatively cheap, and, at the time,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00270.html (8,665 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 1 control box on more than 1 rotor (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:11:45 -0600
Been there, done it, with 2 x 4 pole relays and one +V wire out at a tower. Doug Life is not a spectator sport. I am going to stick a couple more towers in the air and wondering if anyone has tried o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00285.html (7,748 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] 1 control box on more than 1 rotor (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:26:23 -0500
I share one Hy-Gain DCU-1 controller between three rotors: a T2X and two Ham IV rotors. It isn't perfect because the calibration is slightly different between the T2X and Ham IV, but it's good enough
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00290.html (11,039 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu