Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+10\s+inch\s+tube\s+100ft\s+wind\s+load\?\s+NN7J\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 10 inch tube 100ft wind load? NN7J (score: 1)
Author: Dan D <yaesu4u@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
How do you calculate how much load a steel tube 10 inch with .134 wall can handle with no guys 100 ft tall. Dan NN7J. -- Do you Yahoo!? Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail. ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg01179.html (6,621 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 inch tube 100ft wind load? NN7J (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:56:49 -0400
Well, there are beam bending formulas for distributed loading... the windload of the structure itself is nonnegligible, but it's a simple beam so it's straightforward to analyze. Take the formula for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg01182.html (8,289 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] 10 inch tube 100ft wind load? NN7J (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K&Oslash;RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:29:12 -0500
Dan, You can put your numbers through the WD9P mast calculator and see what you get, Here's the URL: http://www.math.niu.edu/KARC/mast/ I put your numbers into the calculator, just out of my own curi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg01185.html (8,648 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 inch tube 100ft wind load? NN7J (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K&Oslash;RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:00:43 -0500
Digging around in the archives I learned it was Telrex that manufactured the "Big Bertha" system in the 1950's ~ 70's. Rich, KE3Q, had a good write-up about this company and their product line. This
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg01186.html (10,663 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 inch tube 100ft wind load? NN7J (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:20:50 -0400
Red, By my calculations the drag on pretty much any antenna element is going to be turbulent, and certainly so for a tens of miles per hour wind. The kinematic viscosity of air is around 1.3*10^-5 m^
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg01188.html (9,666 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 inch tube 100ft wind load? NN7J (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:27:26 -0400
*snip* In other words, it's not safe to put this tube up unguyed. The Array Solutions Big Berthas seem to have a pretty substantial stepped taper to them and appear to be a couple feet in diameter a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg01189.html (8,410 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 inch tube 100ft wind load? NN7J (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman" <danzimmerman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:20:22 -0400
Red, By my calculations the drag on pretty much any antenna element is going to be turbulent, and certainly so for a tens of miles per hour wind. The kinematic viscosity of air is around 1.3*10^-5 m^
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg01190.html (9,510 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 inch tube 100ft wind load? NN7J (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:48:40 -0700
This kind of structure is actually fairly common for things like advertising signs and highway illumination, so I would imagine there are (expensive) cookbook products out there. Going to a 1/2" wall
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg01191.html (8,458 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu