Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+10\s+through\s+20\s+beam\s+traps\s+or\s+no\s+traps\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 through 20 beam traps or no traps (score: 1)
Author: <caraj@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:15:09 -0500
Ed: 40 years ago I bought my second beam a Mosley TA 33. Above 20M the across the pond (E US) Dx would chase it. Rare DX would usually answer. I was also leery of the traps. No problem over many year
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00192.html (11,519 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 through 20 beam traps or no traps (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:32:03 -0400 (EDT)
across the pond (E US) Dx would chase it. Rare DX would usually answer. We don't have any problem with a 3L trap tribander like the TA33 (or A3 or TH3 etc.). The design is pretty basic and well prov
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00225.html (7,874 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 through 20 beam traps or no traps (score: 1)
Author: <caraj@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 05:13:17 -0500
Ed: 40 years ago I bought my second beam a Mosley TA 33. Above 20M the across the pond (E US) Dx would chase it. Rare DX would usually respond. I was also leery of the traps. No problem over many man
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00252.html (12,029 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu