Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+105BA\s+VS\.\s+105CA\s+10\s+Meter\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+105BA\s+VS\.\s+105CA\s+10\s+Meter\s+Antenna\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 105BA VS. 105CA 10 Meter Antenna (score: 1): Author: MBecker@aol.com (MBecker@aol.com); Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 09:17:09 EDT; Hi All, I just downloaded the dimensions to convert my 105BA beam into the 105CA and noticed that some of the new dimensions are much different from the 105BA. Does anyone have any experience with th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00634.html (7,814 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 105BA VS. 105CA 10 Meter Antenna (score: 1): Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt--K7BG); Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 08:25:23 -0600; 105BA. Hi Mike, I did this a while back. I still havent put the converted antenna on the tower so I can't give you first hand info on performance, but I believe I read where it improves forward gain; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00638.html (8,769 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 105BA VS. 105CA 10 Meter Antenna (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 13:23:39 -0400; Definitely worth doing. The BA is pre-computer analysis. The CA is computer optimized. Both of my HiGain 105s are 105CAs, even though one of them started out in life as a BA, but was installed as a C; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00655.html (8,826 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 105BA VS. 105CA 10 Meter Antenna (score: 1): Author: k4oj@ij.net (Jim White, K4OJ); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 10:24:38 -0400; "Maybe if/when I put a non-conducting compensating element at the other end it will balance the weight okay." I have found that the convenient fact of plumbing being sized for ID versus booms being s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00677.html (8,605 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 105BA VS. 105CA 10 Meter Antenna (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider, N3RR); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 02:46:28 +0100; The 105CA, as supplied either as a BA or CA is so light weight that the HiGain clamp, as provided, works just fine. Don't worry about it. My upper 105CA (originally a BA, but installed as a CA) is at; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00679.html (10,217 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 105BA VS. 105CA 10 Meter Antenna (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider, N3RR); Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 02:46:31 +0100; The 105CA, as supplied either as a BA or CA is so light weight that the HiGain clamp, as provided, works just fine. Don't worry about it. My upper 105CA (originally a BA, but installed as a CA) is at; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00680.html (10,211 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]