Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+12\/17m\s+duoband\s+yagi\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+12\/17m\s+duoband\s+yagi\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 12/17m duoband yagi.. (score: 1): Author: on7nq@glo.be (Danny MEES); Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1998 20:42:13 +0200; Hello.. Im working on a new antenna project which will be a duoband wirebeam for 12 and 17m. I would like to aim for 3 L on 17m and 4 L on 12m.. Anyone willing to share his ideas,comments,suggestions; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00134.html (7,329 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 12/17m duoband yagi.. (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1998 21:27:56 -0600; Interlacing elements for two bands on a common boom is a BAD idea. The low frequency directors act as inefficient REFLECTORS on the higher band. That is why Force 12 forward staggers duo band antenna; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00150.html (7,425 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 12/17m duoband yagi.. (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 07:22:28 -0400 (EDT); Another alternative: since 12 and 17 are narrow bands, 2-element Yagis of DE-Dir design are feasible. With their shorter boom requirements, gthey can be placed back-to-back on one boom. If you feed t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00156.html (8,225 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]