Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+135\s+foot\s+dipole\,\s+300\s+ohm\s+twinlead\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: "Buck - N4PGW" <n4pgw-list2@towncorp.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 08:12:03 -0400
I had a 129 foot dipole fed with CATV coax. It did ok, but where the aluminum met the copper, it oxidized and I have been suffering with AM broadcast band bleedover on all frequencies below 14 MHz. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00622.html (8,661 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 08:50:42 -0400
Buck, something isn't right. A properly constructed and tuned balanced feed line antenna should be less likely to generate TVI than a coax fed antenna because there should be little or no radiation f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00623.html (10,132 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:16:37 -0400
tuned balanced than a coax fed from the feed There isn't much difference at all if any. The radiation comes from common mode currents, and either could have problems. Actually twinlead radiates slig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00626.html (10,840 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: "Buck - N4PGW" <n4pgw-list2@towncorp.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:52:06 -0400
The tuner is the TenTec 247. The problem is everywhere on the TV. The balun is a toroid wrapped in wire inside the tuner. It is also causing noise on 2 meters occasionally. Nope! It is on all channe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00645.html (13,253 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:03:20 +0200
If possible I would do away with the balun and run 400-600 ohm line all the way to the tuner, and use a balanced tuner. Also there are some 300 ohm TV twin lead out there that are quite lossy so that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00647.html (10,579 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: "Buck - N4PGW" <n4pgw-list2@towncorp.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:42:52 -0400
The balun is built inside the tuner. I don't have resources to go buy another tuner, etc. This is the low-loss stuff. I figure it is less lossy for the higher frequencies than coax would be. Thanks B
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00650.html (12,302 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:45:31 -0500
Let me take a stab at this. Due to the fact that your TVI is on all channels everywhere in your house, a lot of causes are rulled out. It probable doesn't have anything to do with the fact you change
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00660.html (13,395 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:52:39 -0400
the TV. The balun I've worked on or desigend a lot of tuners, but not that one. I'd need to know more about the balun. The TT tuners I could find use 4:1 baluns, and that generally means they are vo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00661.html (8,954 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:32:07 -0500
"Outside it hangs from the antenna, drops to about a foot above the ground and comes into my window along with several pieces of coax. It goes under my desk about 6-8 feet and wraps back to the top t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00664.html (15,051 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Kass" <timkass@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:36:58 -0400
I agree with Jan here, that is what I have and it works excellent, better than any other dipole and even better than my loop....which was probably not up high enough...homebrew your own balanced tune
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00666.html (12,285 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] 135 foot dipole, 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Alexander" <realex@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:31:44 -0500
Buck, You have made no mention of the ground connection to the tuner. Have you checked it? 73, Bob, W5AH _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Suppo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00670.html (9,844 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu