- 1. [TowerTalk] 14' Extra Worth It for 80m Dipole? (score: 1)
- Author: Edward Sylvester <navydude1962@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
- I have multiple antennas on a Hygain 70' Crank up Tower and a 10' Mast. The 80m Rotary Dipole sits on top at 76'. Have this yearning to raise the the 80m r. dipole so that it sits at 90' with the t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00072.html (6,907 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] 14' Extra Worth It for 80m Dipole? (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
- Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:13:32 -0700
- You can get a decent estimate of what the potential benefit would be by using HFTA, the free application that is included with any recent copy of the ARRL Antenna Book. I have no idea what your terra
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00073.html (8,242 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] 14' Extra Worth It for 80m Dipole? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
- Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 19:43:17 -0800
- I have multiple antennas on a Hygain 70' Crank up Tower and a 10' Mast.? The 80m Rotary Dipole sits on top at 76'.? Have this yearning to raise the the 80m r. dipole so that it sits at 90' with the t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00082.html (9,410 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] 14' Extra Worth It for 80m Dipole? (score: 1)
- Author: "Allen R. Brier" <n5xz@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:59:14 -0600
- What kind of 80m rotary dipole do you have? Can you describe it? Allen Brier N5XZ / KL5DX 1515 Windloch Lane Richmond, TX 77406-2533 281-342-1882 713-705-4801 (Cell) n5xz@arrl.net I have multiple ant
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00083.html (8,379 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] 14' Extra Worth It for 80m Dipole? (score: 1)
- Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
- Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:09:03 -0600
- Which Hygain tower do you have? I only know of one Hygain 70 ft crank-up, and that is the HG-70HD. But that's only rated for 16 sq ft at 60 mph. Do the calculations that VE7RF suggested. That will gi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00084.html (8,291 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu