Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+Meter\s+Bazooka\s+Reprize\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+Meter\s+Bazooka\s+Reprize\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160 Meter Bazooka Reprize (score: 1): Author: Peter Larsen <ve6yc@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:27:21 -0700; Well, thanks for all the answers to my query!! Let's see: !!?? I was under the impression that a double bazooka would have a wider band width. I have used the RG-59 that is spec'ed out by the local c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00010.html (8,205 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 Meter Bazooka Reprize (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:05:29 -0400; ham station. I use RG 6 CATV drop cable extensively, despite the ratings it works very well even for high power feedlines at low frequencies. Never had a failure in 20+ years of doing that. Never tr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00013.html (7,861 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]