Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+Mtr\s+Vertical\s+Query\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+Mtr\s+Vertical\s+Query\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160 Mtr Vertical Query (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:12:02 +0000; In my quest for a 160 meter antenna, I have been looking at one of the 43' verticals such as the DX Engineering or MFJ one. Until such time as I get a tower up, this route seems to be my only alterna; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00752.html (6,993 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 160 mtr vertical Query (score: 1): Author: "Craig D. Smith" <craig@powersmith.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:00:31 -0700; <> In my quest for a 160 meter antenna, I have been looking at one of <> the 43' verticals such as the DX Engineering or MFJ one. Until such <> time as I get a tower up, this route seems to be my onl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00754.html (9,020 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 mtr vertical Query (score: 1): Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:04:47 -0600; This might be worth a read http://www.eham.net/forums/TowerTalk/16020 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00755.html (9,667 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 Mtr Vertical Query (score: 1): Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:33:14 -0600; I just posted my results with a Zero-Five 43 foot vertical, used as an Inverted-L for 160. As-is, the 43 footer will work 160, but only out to about 1000 or so miles with 100 watts, over land (to the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00757.html (7,600 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 Mtr Vertical Query (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:28:21 -0500; I have only used mine for a few tries, and I think I agree with Barry's assessment. It is WAY better than what I had used for 160 before and has much wider bandwidth (formerly using AlphaDelta DX-B s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00026.html (8,312 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]