Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+and\s+80\s+meter\s+receiving\s+antenna\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160 and 80 meter receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Van Fair" <giw@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:17:16 -0500
Dont have room for a Beverage. Can anyone give educated opinion on which is better the K9AY loop or the EWE receiving antenna. I want to use one antenna for 80 and 160 so it will have to be a comprom
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00947.html (7,417 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 and 80 meter receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: "EUGENE SMAR" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 06:35:13 -0500
Van: I had a EWE pointed at Europe for about a season back in 1998-99. I was amazed at how well it worked, considering I had been on Topband only since the year before and had had no experience with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00948.html (8,784 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 and 80 meter receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: Phil Camera <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:28:36 -0600
The EWE is ground dependent; if you have good conductive ground, it'll work well. The K9AY loop as well as a pennant/flag/delta loop is not ground dependent. My EWE's worked well but too close to the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00950.html (9,073 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 and 80 meter receiving antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:48:30 -0500
ground, it'll loop is not That's not quite accurate Phil. ALL of these antennas "act like" a pair of phased verticals. None of them act like loops. The termination really just serves to cause unifor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00951.html (10,467 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu