Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+inverte\s+L\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+inverte\s+L\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160 inverte L (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 14:37:24 -0700; Hi all I just put up a 160 meter inverted L and the antenna is resonant after tweaking about 1850. It shows a resonant SWR of almost 3 to 1, but on the MFJ 259, is shows a resistance of around 40 ohm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00292.html (7,826 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inverte L (score: 1): Author: SavageBR@aol.com; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:45:21 EDT; What do you mean by "resonant". Does the MFJ 259 show zero reactance at the "resonant frequency" where you are reading 40 ohms resistive? Bruce _______________________________________________ See: ht; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00293.html (6,658 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inverte L (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:33:59 -0700; Hi Bruce This is the model 259, not the 259B. It has 2 meters, 1 is "SWR" and the other is "resistance.". _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00294.html (7,720 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inverte L (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:41:29 -0400; "SWR" and the Tom, First... I disagree with the wording on that meter. That meter is labeled resistance, but it is really only resistance under certain specific conditions. Outside of those very spe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00297.html (8,585 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inverte L (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:56:07 -0700; Hi Tom The resistance reading of 40 ohms was at the low point of the SWR reading. There is a definate dip in the SWR, but it is up almost at 3:1. Tom W7WHY ___________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00298.html (8,031 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inverte L (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:58:27 -0500; The MFJ259 doesn't give you the resistive part of the impedance when the SWR is not equal to 1:1. From the tests I have done with it , I think it is giving you the total impedance. In the mnual, they; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00299.html (10,852 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inverte L (score: 1): Author: "Don Moman" <ve6jy@3web.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 03:36:11 -0000; This would be natural if energy from AM broadcast stations is enough to partially mask the minimum SWR point. I am over 100 km from nearest AM transmitter but the MFJ is pinned on any 160m dipole I'v; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00303.html (10,223 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 inverte L (score: 1): Author: "Marc Wullaert" <marc.wullaert3@pandora.be>; Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:02:24 +0200; Look at you display under SWR ...X ? on4ma Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. ___________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00305.html (10,262 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]