Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160\s+meters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: dave@egh.com (David Clemons); Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:32:50 -0400 (EDT); Hi, I currently have use an inverted V with the apex at 55 feet and one of the legs with some bends in it (to keep it on my property). With 100 watts, I get out real well to the Caribbean but the ant; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00667.html (7,600 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: rudder1@ibm.net (Malcolm Clark); Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 09:38:23 +0000; I used a half-sloper on a boat because of space limitations. It worked just OK. I can't think of any reason that one would perform much better than an inverted V (except for the slight bit of directi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00686.html (8,303 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 160 meters (score: 1): Author: "Merlin-7 KI4ILB" <merlin-7@sc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:32:30 +0100; Is it worth it to put up a 160m antenna now? I do not have anything up right now for 160 but I could ground the shield of some coax to my tower and run a long wire from the center of the coax somewhe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00923.html (7,015 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]