Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160m\s+Receive\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160m\s+Receive\s+Antenna\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1): Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 03:01:04 +0000 (GMT); I am very fortunate to have a number of long Beverages for 160m receive. These work very well for DX, but during CQWW last weekend I realised that they are much too directional for running the US - i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00835.html (7,323 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:30:39 -0500; VE3ZI: (1) A short Beverage - perhaps 300'; (2) A single K9AY; (3) A single flag; (4) A single EWE. Roger I would add a low dipole or inv-V to your list. It will work very well within 3-400 miles of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00000.html (6,304 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1): Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera); Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:15:02 +0000; VE3ZI: (1) A short Beverage - perhaps 300'; (2) A single K9AY; (3) A single flag; (4) A single EWE. None of the above Put up a low dipole for that close in stuff. (And, the short Beverage will just n; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00002.html (7,343 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1): Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:43:08 +0000 (GMT); Many thanks to all who replied both on the list and privately. Several suggested a low dipole as an alternative. That antenna I already have and whilst it does work well it is more or less omni-direc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00042.html (8,808 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:51:59 +0100; Hi Roger, I use 3 short beverages as well, length are two with 45m, the other 60m. I found them always very useful on 160m and 80m as well during the contests. Either I hear two different stations Q5; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00043.html (9,097 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1): Author: "John Wagner" <jwagner@dxengineering.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:54:38 -0500; The Receive Four Square using active antennas is also worth looking at. www.dxengineering.com 73, John W8JJW _______________________________________________ __________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00044.html (8,997 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Receive Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:43:41 -0800 (PST); On 160 meters, several thousand feet is only a handfull of wavelengths. I can show you plenty of locations several thousand feet from anything that have lots of power line noise. My own vertical is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00047.html (8,879 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]