Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160m\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160m\s+vertical\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] 160m Vertical (score: 1): Author: K2EK@aol.com; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:28:32 EDT; Geez - considering the collective effort to analyze this, we could have (collectively) built 10 or more verticals for this guy.... One thing I do not remember reading in all of the posts... Was condu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00067.html (8,509 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] 160m vertical (score: 1): Author: JP Lyet <jpl3@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:25:51 -0400; Anyone ever try putting a commercial 160m verical atop a tower with a single yagi multiband??? Have a Butternut which worked great on the ground with radials. Can't imagine there isn't a way to utili; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00460.html (6,595 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 20:07:08 +0000; I recall a rule that commercially licensed stations must take the effects of their tower on nearby BC stations into consideration, but I have never seen anything in Part 97 requiring hams to take a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-02/msg00046.html (7,782 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:31:35 -0500; Don - Commercial tower owners need to detune their towers to insure they don't mess up an AM broadcast antenna pattern. In searching for how to detune my tower with a 160 4-square around it, I ran in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2018-02/msg00054.html (8,582 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]