Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160m\s+vertical\s+and\s+the\s+number\s+of\s+radials\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 12:25:50 -0500
I find it way easier and much more straightforward to simply record the specific X and R at the feedpoint when you install the antenna. Then make it a habit of check that measurement once a year at t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00014.html (7,114 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: WESLEY ATTAWAY <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:58:20 +0000
Ed's reply seems completely reasonable to me. It is easy to do and you get a good idea about anything that might require some attention. -- Wes Attaway - N5WA Shreveport, LA -- ______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00022.html (8,917 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 12:28:29 -0700
I agree although you might want to remove any matching devices. In my case, I shorten the loading wire on my inverted-L to add capacitive reactance and then shunt the feedpoint with an inductor.  I g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00023.html (8,705 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:21:23 -0500
Conversely, and this is a liberal arts guy talking , it would seem logical that as you laid down radicals, you could watch the R component, and when the R value curve flattened out "enough", you coul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00025.html (9,034 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:23:15 -0800
And if you have an inexpensive VNA - you can run TDR function and probably get some idea of where the problem is.  You can certainly tell if coax has been damaged mid run. ___________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00028.html (9,743 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 14:51:45 -0800
It all depends on the difficulty/cost of adding more. The radiation resistance of a vertical, which represents radiated power, is a function of the vertical height, not the total length. There's a gr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00036.html (8,520 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Brian Beezley <k6sti@att.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:28:59 -0800
K9YC: "The likely unknown here is the soil characteristic plugged into the model, as compared to what we have. :)" I'll use this as an excuse to plug my ground probe calculator. Build your own ground
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00037.html (8,158 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 21:36:02 -0500
Understood, Jim. Interestingly, I just found out that the ground conductivity in my area is probably very good, on the order of 2-4 millisiemens, which may reduce the need for a huge number of radial
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00042.html (10,130 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Dan Maguire <danac6la@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 20:03:34 -0800
Marginally related. In the README.TXT for Brian's Ground Probe Calculator 3.20 you'll find this statement: "Wavelength in soil is much shorter than in air." With EZNEC, including the now free v. 7.0
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00043.html (10,332 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 05:19:17 -0600
For US hams wanting to get a rough idea of where they land in the ground conductivity lottery, you can look at the high def. FCC map and either cheer or weep. But, keep in mind, the boundaries were d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00045.html (8,924 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m vertical and the number of radials (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 12:12:41 -0600
By the way, your local soil map can be found at: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm Probably not very accurate, but a good approximation. Chuck W5PR _____________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00053.html (11,477 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu