Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+2\s+el\s+monobanders\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+2\s+el\s+monobanders\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 2 el monobanders (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 17:49:29 -0800; Hi All After this weekends NAQP, I've just about come to the conclusion that 2 el monobanders would be better than the TH-3 I'm currently using. Right now, the TH-3 is cut for the CW band, and as man; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00313.html (8,622 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 2 el monobanders (score: 1): Author: Jim" <jdc@ieway.com (Jim); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 09:57:38 -0800; Looks like you need to put up a LM KAT-34...... You should look into it... 73 Jim W7RY -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00314.html (9,815 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 2 el monobanders (score: 1): Author: Jim" <jdc@ieway.com (Jim); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:10:36 -0800; Lets make that a KLM KT-34 A Look like you need to put up a good KLM KT-34A 73 and good luck (I gotta love spell checkers) Jim W7RY --Original Message-- From: Jim <jdc@ieway.com> To: w7why@harborside; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00315.html (11,018 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 2 el monobanders (score: 1): Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:20:01 GMT; The objections you voice are precisely the reasons behind the Force 12 C3 & C3S and antennas of similar design. Traps will always narrow bandwidth. Shorter booms will always have narrower bandwidth t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00318.html (12,642 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 2 el monobanders (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 17:23:17 EST; Point taken. You had me going for a minute. Considering our antenna test report results, I would recommend a Force 12 C-3 over any trapped antenna with a similar boomlength. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- FA; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00321.html (7,958 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 2 el monobanders (score: 1): Author: k3gt@pgh.net (Bob Thacker); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:11:49 -0500; How about a C-3 compared to a TH11DX? Bob, K3GT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00325.html (8,126 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 2 el monobanders (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:20:02 EST; No mystery there - they're both in the report. http://www.championradio.com or 888-833-3104 for more details or ordering. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Champion Radio Products Tower Tech -- FAQ on WWW: http://; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00326.html (8,032 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] 2 el monobanders (score: 1): Author: k5ed@dzn.com (Ed Jensen); Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 11:16:31 -0700; Hi, I too had a TH3, but based on models and Steve's talk at Dayton went to a 2 el, but in a somewhat different manner. I considered the C3S but cost drove me to a semi homebrew solution. I reasoned; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00345.html (8,543 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] 2 el monobanders (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:42:55 -0600; N4KG comments below. Sounds like the old TELREX TB-2? antenna, with a trapped driven element and separate reflectors for each band. Great way to home brew a second antenna for side mounting below a h; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00447.html (10,130 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]