Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+2\s+identical\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+2\s+identical\s+antennas\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 2 identical antennas (score: 1): Author: "AI9L" <ai9l@core.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:00:48 -0500; what would the difference be between two tri band beams one at 65 feet and 1 at 110 feet if the beams were both exactly the same _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00160.html (7,379 bytes)
2. RE: [TowerTalk] 2 identical antennas (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:37:37 -0400; 45 feet. 73, Jeff Maass K8ND _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00161.html (8,213 bytes)
3. RE: [TowerTalk] 2 identical antennas (score: 1): Author: "Brian Lambert" <n1ik@n1ik.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:41:53 -0400; Well, it depends mainly on your terrain, but, generally, the higher antenna will exhibit better low-angle performance (DX), and the lower antenna will exhibit better high angle performance. You shoul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00162.html (8,866 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 identical antennas (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:42:42 -0500; or 13.716 meters! -- Original Message -- From: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com> To: "AI9L" <ai9l@core.com>; "TOWER TALK" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 6:37 PM Subje; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00163.html (9,141 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 identical antennas (score: 1): Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 21:47:58 -0400; The lower one will tend to be better (you will be louder) for closer in things and the higher one will tend to be better for farther away things. A low tribander, even lower than 65', can be very goo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00166.html (9,511 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]