Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+204BA\s+boom\s+resonance\,\s+problem\s+for\s+40\s+or\s+not\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+204BA\s+boom\s+resonance\,\s+problem\s+for\s+40\s+or\s+not\s+\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 204BA boom resonance, problem for 40 or not ? (score: 1): Author: Marko L Myllymaki <marko.l.myllymaki@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:57:24 -0700; Hi, Would anyone have any insight to offer on this or real life experience of this combination you could share: I know some of the tribander booms+end elements such as KT36XA with non-insulated eleme; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00253.html (8,284 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 204BA boom resonance, problem for 40 or not ? (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 06:17:35 -0500; The 204ba boom will have no effect on the 40m beam if parallel. Regarding 15m, the linear loaded 40m beam is not resonant on 15m so there should not be problems mounting it 11 feet above and parallel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00254.html (9,194 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 204BA boom resonance, problem for 40 or not ? (score: 1): Author: Marko L Myllymaki <marko.l.myllymaki@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:57:12 -0700; Thanks very much John ! You are right on 15 m boom interaction with 20 if mounted 90 degrees apart. My 1st plan was to use 3 element 15 and so with short boom on this tower (as I will have another 15; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00260.html (11,259 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 204BA boom resonance, problem for 40 or not ? (score: 1): Author: <k2qmf@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:07:56 -0400; I have a 204BA at 70 feet and a Cushcraft 40-2CD at 80 feet on the same mast! No interaction at all! 73, Ted K2QMF ____________________________________________________________ The #1 Worst Carb Ever?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00263.html (10,806 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 204BA boom resonance, problem for 40 or not ? (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:08:17 -0500; A Moxon antenna may react differently than a loaded element 40m beam. I have never modeled a Moxon. I had very little interaction between a shortened (loading coils) 2el 40m OptiBeam and a homebrew 4; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00271.html (9,589 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]