Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+205BA\s+vs\s+205CA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+205BA\s+vs\s+205CA\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 205BA vs 205CA (score: 1): Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin); Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 12:40:14 -0500; There are a number of differences. The BA model had problems with front-to-back in the real world. It's performance was less consistant than the 204BA. The 205CA has had a number of changes made to t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00497.html (7,175 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 205BA vs 205CA (score: 1): Author: "Neil Sheldon" <azneil@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:44:02 -0700; Good day to all ? I recently acquired a 205BA, and looking at the manual, I see quite different spacing between that and the 205CA I?m sure this has been covered before, probably in great detail, but; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00229.html (6,952 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 205BA vs 205CA (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:03:47 -0500; Hi Neil They are the same antenna. The 205BA is the older version, and has the screw & clamp style clamps to hold the elements together. They tend to rust and break. The 205CA has stainless hoseclamp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00231.html (8,116 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 205BA vs 205CA (score: 1): Author: "Dino Darling" <dino@kx6d.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 08:22:23 -0700; The spacing is optimized, but does not follow along with the OWA spacing. Two different animals. Dino - KX6D Hi Neil They are the same antenna. The 205BA is the older version, and has the screw & cla; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-12/msg00235.html (8,785 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]