Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+205CA\s+vs\s+204BA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+205CA\s+vs\s+204BA\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 205CA vs 204BA (score: 1): Author: hygain@compuserve.com (Roger A. Cox WB0DGF); Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 13:50:47 -0500; The 205CA is on a 34 foot boom. W2PV has shown that with this length boom on 20m, usually you can get good gain OR good F/B but not both at the same time. The older 205BA had good gain, approx. 6.9 d; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00296.html (7,380 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 205CA vs 204BA (score: 1): Author: km9p@akorn.net (Bill Fisher, N4VJ & K4AAA); Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 17:49:35 -0500 (EST); In summary... And W6QHS told me the same thing: The 204BA is darn good antenna for what it is. 73 -- Bill Fisher, N4VJ / K4AAA http://www.contesting.com -- -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00302.html (8,427 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]