Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+20M\s+16\s+El\s+yagi\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+20M\s+16\s+El\s+yagi\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] 20M 16 El yagi (score: 1): Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:14:57 -0400; I can see building this thing, if you lived in the black hole, or just wanted to run EU in contests. But only at 50'? I wonder if he modelled it to see if a shorter antenna @ 70' would have been bett; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00591.html (32,718 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 20M 16 El yagi (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:16:43 -0700; Just as a comparison, I looked up some specs for long boom 432 MHz Yagis with 16-24 elements using google.. Looks like that 16 el beast would have a beam width on the order of 30 degrees. call it hal; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00596.html (8,530 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 20M 16 El yagi (score: 1): Author: Michael Germino <ad6aa@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:49:06 -0700 (PDT); It sure looks like it would be easier to put up a Rhombic than that large yagi. I wonder how a Rhombic, in the same space would compare. It would at least be multi-band. Mike AD6AA ** Jim Lux <jimlux; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00611.html (7,456 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]