- 1. [TowerTalk] 3 High Stack Switching (score: 1)
- Author: k4ab@nerak.companet.net (Larry A. Crim)
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 14:54:56 -0500 (CDT)
- What type of switching system are most people using for 3 high stacks of mono-banders? The only switching system I've seen documented is the N2RM system described by K8CC in the NCJ in 1991. I'm sure
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00625.html (8,032 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] 3 High Stack Switching (score: 1)
- Author: geoiii@bga.com (george fremin iii)
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 16:32:30 -0500 (CDT)
- WX0B makes a switch that works very well. I have three high stacks where the bottom two antennas are fixed to the NE/Europe and are feed in phase all the time. Then I just do simple U/L/Both switchi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00627.html (8,539 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] 3 High Stack Switching (score: 1)
- Author: k4ab@nerak.companet.net (Larry A. Crim)
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 19:41:18 -0500 (CDT)
- Rush, W7RM, uses a clever scheme that has the top antenna in all the time and switches the other 2 in and out. I saw his presentation but don't remember all the details. It looked really simple and t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00630.html (8,439 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] 3 High Stack Switching (score: 1)
- Author: K4OJ@aol.com (K4OJ@aol.com)
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 00:08:01 -0400 (EDT)
- please share your response from the group...when I asked a similar question last week the consensus was to go to the old NCJ article by K8CC.....it has been so long since it was written that I questi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00635.html (8,077 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] 3 High Stack Switching (score: 1)
- Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten)
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 07:55:17 EDT
- K1VR writes: You owe it to yourself to investigate the WX0B system, whether for monobanders or tribanders, simply because it is so very easy to install and use. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00672.html (8,452 bytes)
- 6. [TowerTalk] 3 High Stack Switching (score: 1)
- Author: force12@interserv.com (force12@interserv.com)
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 14:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
- The switching system by Jay, WX0B has been fine. Have installed many of them and they have not failed. I use simple, equal length lines, as they have been installed mostly on multiband, single feedli
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00691.html (8,355 bytes)
- 7. [TowerTalk] 3 High Stack Switching (score: 1)
- Author: k4isv@westky.com (Bud)
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 20:28:28 -0500
- -- To: <towertalk@contesting.com> them the WX0B switch and it certainly works FB ( on one set of antennas). I would like to mention that on a very very high percentage of contacts the ALL position is
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00701.html (9,633 bytes)
- 8. [TowerTalk] 3 High Stack Switching (score: 1)
- Author: w2up@itw.com (Barry Kutner)
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 01:40:03 +0000
- I have found the same thing on my 2 stack of TH7s. If I had to do it again, the only reason I would do the upper/lower/both switch, is for when I point the 2 Yagis in different directions. Most commo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00702.html (8,813 bytes)
- 9. [TowerTalk] 3 High Stack Switching (score: 1)
- Author: jayt@arraysolutions.com (Jay Terleski)
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 21:51:25 -0700
- Interesting, seems like here in Texas the propagation changes more dramatically during the day to favor different combinations of beams. I frequently find that the lower or middle beam combinations w
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00705.html (11,217 bytes)
- 10. [TowerTalk] 3 High Stack Switching (score: 1)
- Author: k3mm@erols.com (Tyler Stewart)
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 03:40:33 +0100
- Negative. I dont agree with K4ISV, although I'm certain you could find others that would. While I most often find that all three work the best (or at least the top two), there are times that other co
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00706.html (10,136 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu