Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+4\s+TH6\'s\s+1\s+tower\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+4\s+TH6\'s\s+1\s+tower\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 4 TH6's 1 tower? (score: 1): Author: dtrbizan@netcom.ca (dtrbizan@netcom.ca); Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 20:14:42 -0500; Need Input, After a long talk with a friend, my idea of stacking 4 th6's on a 140 ft. tower got another thumbs down. I want to install a low maintance system that will cover 10-15-20m. any ideas. Tha; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00314.html (6,986 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 4 TH6's 1 tower? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC); Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 12:21:32 EST; I'd be curious why you backed off on the high performance stack. Cost, scope of project, etc.? The answer to your question may be a 2-stack of TH6s? But nonetheless, you may want to read my paper "Bu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00339.html (7,507 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 4 TH6's 1 tower? (score: 1): Author: k4isv@westky.com (Bud); Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 23:02:06 -0600; -- To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I dont see why anyone would give you a thumbs down on your project... The TH6 is a very reliable tribander... I do think the TH7 is a bit better... I would suggest u; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00345.html (8,135 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]