Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40M\/80M\s+Vertical\s+Choice\s+\-\s+second\s+attempt\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40M/80M Vertical Choice - second attempt (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Talmadge W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:16:21 -0500
It seems that the Yahoo Group truncated my table - I 'll try again I have decided to replace my makeshift 40/80M vertical with a store bought model and have narrowed the choices to two: The Butternut
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00260.html (7,925 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M/80M Vertical Choice - second attempt (score: 1)
Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:33:16 -0700
Two questions - 1) Where did you get those prices? They are better than what I find. 2) How do you determine the advantage? It would seem that lower height and weight would be better, but you have th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00261.html (8,947 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M/80M Vertical Choice - second attempt (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Talmadge W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:42:30 -0500
1) The prices came from R & L 2) Higher is better for Low Bands and more weight means more (heavier gauge) aluminum. Clint Talmadge - W5CPT Two questions - 1) Where did you get those prices? They are
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00262.html (10,205 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M/80M Vertical Choice - second attempt (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Schaaf" <dan-schaaf@att.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:50:25 -0400
Instead of a remote tuner, why not remotely switch in either doorknob caps and/or Toroid inductors. Most remote tuners are no more than 200 watt capability. Most likely because the size of the necess
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00263.html (11,897 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M/80M Vertical Choice - second attempt (score: 1)
Author: "Clint Talmadge W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:08:43 -0500
The adding of top loading to the HF2 is out because I do not want guys. If I could put up with guys I would have gone for the MFJ-1793 - top loading and 20 meters - but it MUST be guyed. I am not tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00265.html (10,850 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] 40M/80M Vertical Choice - second attempt (score: 1)
Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:18:01 -0700
I have the Butternut HF-2V. I added two more taps to the 80 meter coil and use 3 relays to select the tap I want (3500, 3600 and 3800). I can select the relay from the shack and it works quite well.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00266.html (12,342 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu