Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40M\s+Beam\s+Interaction\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40M\s+Beam\s+Interaction\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40M Beam Interaction (score: 1): Author: k3nd@yahoo.com (GALE STEWARD); Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:48:45 -0700 (PDT); I have heard that the "new" Cushcraft, 2 el 40M beam (XM240) has substantial interaction with nearby 20 M, full size, elements. I understand that the older 40-2CD doesn't exhibit this tendency! Anyon; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00010.html (8,007 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 40M Beam Interaction (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 14:01:10 EDT; I have installed 402CD's as close as six feet from a tribander with some degradation in SWR but you could live with it. I have recently installed my first XM240 and even eight feet away from a TH11,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00011.html (8,467 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 40M Beam Interaction (score: 1): Author: sales@radiosonline.com (Scott Bullock); Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 15:15:28 -0400; I have one above a th-7 by 11',the only problem I have had was a resonant feedline length which was easily cured. Works gangbusters! Scott KA1CLX <bold><bigger> Advantage Communications </bigger></bo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00012.html (9,090 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 40M Beam Interaction (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com); Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 12:33:17 -0600; It is possible to have the 40 meter feedline just the right (or wrong) length to make the 40 meter driven element resonant or near-resonant on 10, 15, or 20. A quick way to test for this condition is; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00013.html (9,810 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 40M Beam Interaction (score: 1): Author: Brian.Harris@sv.sc.philips.com (Brian Harris); Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 14:04:03 -0700; Gale, My XM-240 is 10' above and parallel with my TH6. The SWR of the TH6 was not effected much on 20 and 10 meters (compared to measured values when it was pointed straight up). 15 meters is another; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00014.html (9,086 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 40M Beam Interaction (score: 1): Author: N4CW@aol.com (N4CW@aol.com); Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 18:01:14 EDT; I'm still wondering about the following statement included with the Assembly and Installation instructions for the XM240: "Installation Recommendations & Operating Tips"......"1. Vertically and horiz; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00015.html (7,825 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 40M Beam Interaction (score: 1): Author: earlham@radiks.net (Iowaguy); Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 22:13:19 -0500; Hi all: I have a new XM240 which is ready to go on the tower. Hopefully, I'll be putting it up in the next week or two. It'll be replacing my Mosley S403 for which I have had a steady stream of mecha; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00020.html (9,279 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] 40M Beam Interaction (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 11:11:11 -0700; I posted this a few days back. But I don't remember seeing it on the reflector. I didn't get a delivery falure message either... Anyhow, here goes again. -- Start of forwarded message -- Return-Path:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00085.html (10,995 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]