Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40m\s+Moxon\s+over\s+or\s+under\s+4\-el\s+Steppir\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40m Moxon over or under 4-el Steppir? (score: 1)
Author: David Aslin G3WGN <david@aslinvc.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 22:32:58 +0000
Consulting the TT hive mind. I'm sure someone has faced/modelled this question: I have a 100ft tower with 16ft stub mast. The two antennas I plan to mount are a W6NL 40m Moxon and a 4-el Ultrabeam (w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00187.html (7,584 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m Moxon over or under 4-el Steppir? (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 20:08:11 -0700
David, One question is which W6NL Moxon as there are three - original scratch build, Cushcraft mod, and high strength Cushcraft mod? I've built two of the original and own a third from another builde
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00188.html (10,869 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m Moxon over or under 4-el Steppir? (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 20:23:12 -0700
An oops correction: I misread the swr plot and the modeled resonance plot is at 26.4 MHz. So interaction on 12m might not be a problem. Grant KZ1W One question is which W6NL Moxon as there are three
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00189.html (11,141 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m Moxon over or under 4-el Steppir? (score: 1)
Author: Tony Brock-Fisher via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 08:30:17 -0400
I have had a 2 element 40m beam and a tribander on the same mast/tower for decades. At first the 40m beam was a 40-2CD, later a W6NL Moxon. In early days the tribander was a KT34-XA or KT36-XA, but f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00191.html (9,693 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu