Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40m\s+Yagi\s+\@\s+66\'\s+vs\s+92\'\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40m\s+Yagi\s+\@\s+66\'\s+vs\s+92\'\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40m Yagi @ 66' vs 92' (score: 1): Author: wstrahl@nwsca.nw.lucent.com (wstrahl@nwsca.nw.lucent.com); Date: 3 Mar 99 14:02:00 -0600; I currently have a 89' US Tower, which I usually park at 80' for greater strength ... less stress on me :-) .... with a KT-34XA at 81' and a 2 el shorty 40 at the mast top at 92'. I'm contemplating s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00062.html (8,353 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 40m Yagi @ 66' vs 92' (score: 1): Author: dave@egh.com (David Clemons); Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:01:08 -0500 (EST); Hi Wayne, At various times (in Massachusetts) I have had a Cushcraft 402CD at 66 feet and at 90/95 feet. There is a big difference at this location. At 66 feet I was opening 40 meters before anyone a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00063.html (8,317 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 40m Yagi @ 66' vs 92' (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger, K2AV" <k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 02:25:48 -0500; I would want to see a terrain analysis, e.g., the effect of your terrain on the idealized pattern of your 40 meter antenna. But in general, the 70 foot height suppresses high angle radiation, and has; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00066.html (10,498 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 40m Yagi @ 66' vs 92' (score: 1): Author: mpride@us.ibm.com (mpride@us.ibm.com); Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 05:57:54 -0500; Comments regarding band openings from W1 to Eu represents the issue of, at the beginning of the opening, in order to have the best signal level and remembering the D-Layer is quite prevalent due to s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00067.html (8,507 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 40m Yagi @ 66' vs 92' (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 11:53:54 +0000; Just a couple of comments ... The 75-77 degree lobe is essentially meaningless for ionospheric propagation, except maybe some specialized modes for near-in QSOs (NVIS). The main lobe data need to be; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00068.html (9,347 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 40m Yagi @ 66' vs 92' (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:02:49 -0600; I have 2 element "shorty" 40M yagis at 65, 125, and 195' with a WX0B StackMatch to switch them. Of course, this is from W5 land. The lower antenna is better in the afternoon before sunset for listeni; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00070.html (8,352 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 40m Yagi @ 66' vs 92' (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 09:03:51 -0500; We have to be very careful comparing antennas at different locations on different days and reaching conclusions. There are so many variables in the equation, the results wind up being pretty subject; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00071.html (8,327 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] 40m Yagi @ 66' vs 92' (score: 1): Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 17:21:09 GMT; There is a *very large difference* between the pattern of a 2 el 40 yagi at 125 feet and at 92 feet. The (useless?) lobe at 75 degrees on the 92 foot antenna, raised to 125 feet, drops down to someth; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00075.html (9,728 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]